Sunday, October 4, 2009

Sony PSP Go...Why Sony Why?

Sony Corporation just introduced a new hand-held gaming system...very similar to the Nintendo DSi or the regular Sony PlayStation Portable (PSP). The new digital game download only system is the PSP Go. It is an upgrade from the older PSP-3000 (which utilized a disc format for games call the UMD). I just asked Sony to respond to my soapbox which is noted below:

"I do not believe in piracy but I do believe in fair play and common sense. If I purchased a UMD for my older PSP, then purchase a PSP GO, in no way should I have to re-purchase these older games I already own. I'll say it again...I already own.

I also believe that somewhere out there they will find a way to convert UMD via your older PSP to a file on your PC. Then finally into a format the PSP GO can use. When that day comes, I will buy a PSP GO.

I have NO problem returning the UMD directly to Sony and getting a email voucher for a download of the same exact title. I have no problem returning the case, the insert, the disc, the UPC code...I'll happily return it all.

Given my history with Sony products from TV's to clock radio's...why not enhance the customer's experience instead of making them angry when long term...new games will be downloaded?

On a separate note...we are all trying to be GREEN minded and environmentally conscious. Why not use the same adapters, chargers, batteries, etc. where possible? Yes, I know...MONEY. When they say it's not about the money...It's about the MONEY. Yep, I get that. The problem is that while firms make a quick buck with different connectors and adapters...long term they hurt the environment, fill up for landfills, and generally...care less about the customer.

I love Sony products, I really do. I just am disappointed in the UMD decision and that they would rather me not upgrade than to be happier with a gaming system that utilizes all my old games so that I really felt I got my money's worth in the first place.

Sorry for the soap box but the PSP GO boat just sailed without me and I wanted to purchase a ticket to ride."

Monday, June 8, 2009

A Republican Changing His Tune...

I have been a die-hard Republican since 1984. In most elections, I have voted a straight Republican ticket. Some of the platforms I still agree with...strong defense, less federal government control, stronger States rights, fewer social welfare programs, lower taxes, etc. About the only thing I ever disagreed with was the abortion stance. I have always been pro-choice. Imagine that...a pro-choice Republican.

Anyway...I had voted for George W. Bush twice. Yes, twice. I never did really appreciate the attitudes I saw in Al Gore in 2000 or John Kerry in 2004. Both seemed born rich and stuck with a silver spoon in their mouths. In fairness, George probably was too.

Initially, I was for the war. I believed that kicking Saddam Hussein in the a** was a good thing. He had created torture chambers, he killed thousands of Kurds with gas, and was clearly a bastard. Human rights was not in his ideology. Torture and fear were his weapons. While I suspected their were no weapons of mass destruction, the fact that Saddam kept defying UN requests and booting out inspectors all the time only fueled his own demise. When push came to shove, he never really believed that the U.S. would invade Iraq. When the ultimatum came...'let the inspectors in or we'll destroy the weapons of mass destruction (WMD)'...You knew it was going to be ugly and it was.

Pretty soon after, we confirmed that their were no WMD's at all. He had bluffed. We called it and went in. Again, not that Saddam did not deserve it. He did. We should have dropped a grenade down his fox hole and called it a day. It was just a little uneasy for me that we just never found any WMD's. I mean nothing. Then it seemed that we had pushed the WMD argument just to go in. Sure, he deserved it but at what price? After the invasion, it became evident that the President's cabinet, specifically Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were pushing it. Only Colin Powell said 'no'. Was it to cover up the fact we needed to protect foreign oil? That our economy would falter without it? That disagreement ended up with his resignation. A shame too. I liked him and he was pretty trustworthy.

What about Afghanistan? Why were we in Iraq when Osama Bin Laded was in another country? How do you argue that the terrorist capital is in Iraq when the attacks were planned from Afghanistan? It smells foul if you ask me.

When this election came upon us...I thought...'No...I am not voting for a Republican this time. It's time for a party change. We should vote ourselves out of office for the issues surrounding the Iraq war mess. Let someone else have a shot'. While I respect John McCain...I really do. The issue here is that it would be four more years of the Bush regime. He has voted with the Republican party over 90% of the time. He is not going to change anything in Washington. It's more of the same old guard. Washington insiders. Even the age issue is fair. He has had health issues in the past and at 72 would be the oldest to ever take office as President. I believe Ronald Reagan was 69 when he first started his first term. Then we add in the financial crisis. No offense but anyone related to the Keating Five scandal and the failing of the Savings & Loan institutions is not someone I want in the middle of Wall Street trying to fix this.

Based on this information, I will be voting for Barack Obama come November 4th.

Respect For The Office of President...

I have always been disappointed with the respect that is shown to a great many things including The Office of the President of the United States. We may disagree with George W. Bush...and I currently do by the way but that is no reason to be disrespectful of him as a human being or his current office. You can show your disdain in a variety of ways but why soil the man, the office, and the country at the same time?

I was never a fan of William J. Clinton and I chuckled at the ethical dilema's he created for himself when he was President. That said...I never publicly disrespected him or his office. He was The President of the United States. He and his office deserved that much...even if you disagree with him completely. The job is probably the hardest imagineable. Look at the toll it took on past Presidents...Clinton was in for eight years and looked like he aged twenty or more. Bush was in for eight years and he looks like he's also aged another twenty years. That job is not easy.

No problem with speaking out against a President but it should be done in a professional manner respectful of the office. Many people today...children and adults are stuck in this 'it's a free country so let me spit right here' thing and spout off whatever they like. What happened to Mother's advice...'If you do not have something good to say, do not say anything at all'. Maybe I miss the good old days when advice like that was taken to heart.

I do not think kids in the 1950's made comments like The Dixie Chicks did...Why would you call your President an idiot, etc. in front of a foreign audience? That is beyond my comprehension. While you disagree and many others will too...Just do it in respectful manner. Look what they achieved with that disrespectful tirade...Burned records and a career cut short. They have never been the same since. I do not wish ill upon them, I actually like their music but I do not think it's remotely acceptable to call the President an idiot in any way, shape or form.

Let's work the problem and the solution. Another piece of Mom's advice...'Treat others as you would have others treat you...' Better yet...'If you have nothing good to say, don't say it...' Hmmm....I think that covers it.

The End Of The World As We Know It...

Stop the world, I want to get off...

1) Overpopulation. From space we must look like an ant colony. Constantly growing, expanding. Using more natural resources up each decade. More people, more stuff. Does it take a genius to see that if the world does not control the entire population we are ultimately doomed? Everything from pollution, destruction of the ozone, melting of the polar ice caps, the shrinking Amazon rainforest, and growing landfills can all be traced back to us, the human race. China is about the only country with a working solution to control its population growth. While human rights might be an issue, population growth is a problem they understand. Until the world agrees to limit population growth in every country, we're in trouble deeeeeep.

2) DNA. We are born with a desire to fight each other. It's in the DNA. Do you really think the human race can put aside differences and all agree on a common goal and solution? Governments argue. Governments fight. Governments invade. People argue. People fight. People invade. Even within countries, people cannot get along for the common good. The hunt or be hunted philosophy lives strong in all of us. Where are we headed? Ponder this...Albert Einstein said...'I cannot tell you how World War III will be fought, but I can tell you how World War IV will be fought...with sticks and stones.' I think that pretty sums up where we are headed unless we get along with each other.

3) It's all about ME. Everything is in the moment. Everything is a rush. No time. Gotta get here, gotta go there, gotta get to work, gotta get home, gotta get dinner, gotta go to bed. In terms of real people...just how many are concerned with how things affect others. Very few I would guess. I do not mean to pick on the wealthy but if they spent half of their fortune on helping the poor, the malnourished, etc...would it not be a better world? What about actors? Most of these 'A' list actors get $20 million per picture. Why not donate half of that? I think Brad Pitt has done some good and even built houses for the Hurricane Katrina victims with some photo ops as well. I guess I should be grateful that he does anything since so many do not. I only wish they gave their cash to a cause and not a few hours time. I mean give millions, not thousands. Do a Bill Gates or Warren Buffet type of thing...leave it all to charity. Maybe they will...

4) No one is to blame. No one person is at fault...we all are. We all contribute to pollution. We all say that we do not want future generations paying our 'bills'. Ahhh...A little too late for that wouldn't ya say? Future generations will be forced to pay for our gluttony of mistakes. It cannot be avoided. Try talking to a neighbor about something minor. Imaging trying to get the world on board for something....nuclear arms reductions, population control, health care, etc. It's more of a dream now than ever before. Do you believe we can make it 200 more years?

5) Our smarts are killing us or the industrial revolution. When people migrated North from Africa and moved into the Northern European countries where food and shelter were scarce...over centuries of time...something clicked and the mother of invention blossomed. We could forge steel, build castles, farm land, etc. Imagine life in the year 1000...1500...1700...1800...1900...2008...look at the leaps in technology. Look at the last 100 years...cars, modern homes, buildings, cell phones, calculators, flying to the moon, and the internet. The leaps have been astounding. The period from say 1900 to 2008 has been incredible. At no previous time in history did we make the leaps we made in the past 108 years from a technology perspective. The only downside...population lives longer, more people, more everything, and the process of destruction escalates.

6) Stress. No question that stress cuts our lives short. Do more with less. Work longer hours. Stay competitive. Cut jobs. Downsize. Reorganize. Check that email. Depression. Anxiety. Imagine this...more people now and fewer jobs since we technically build everything with mass production. Use robots. Displace workers. Funny, when everyone is displaced...just who is buying your product? Families shortchanged. Many one parent households. Cancer strikes everywhere.

to be continued...

Why must campaining be so negative?

I really hate these negative ads. They are basically wrong, outright lies, or twists of the truth taken out of context. Recently NBC did a check of both McCain and Obama advertising. Obama had 34% of ads seen as negative toward McCain. McCain had an astounding 100% negative ads against Obama.

What happened to straight talk? What happened to where we are and where are we going as a country? What happened to being civil?

I hope everyone has already made up their mind one way or the other. Clearly, the last 30 days of any campaign are so full of finger pointing and half-truths that all of it should be ignored. Do not believe what you see, read, or hear in the days leading up to the election. Focus on the issues. What are you going to do? Not...He's not trustworthy, he's not ready, he associated with this character, etc.

What a waste of time...

Sarah Palin - Friend, Foe Or Scapegoat?

I have plenty of thoughts on the election. This blog deals with Sarah Palin. When she was introduced at the Republican National Convention I really was speechless. Not good or bad...just speechless. On the positive side she was energetic, engaging, funny, current. She gave a rousing speech. She was an outsider who would ride into Washington and change the body politic forever. On the negative side John McCain selected her after just meeting her one time? Was it a joke? She had no foreign policy experience? What about Leiberman, Romney, anyone? Was John McCain senile? Was he trying to say 'Hey, I'm a maverick! So check out my running mate?' What did that say about his judgment?

Over the weeks that followed...the interviews, the hiccups...'What do you read each day?....We'll I read everything...What exactly do you read...Just all of it'. The $150,000 clothes debacle. Her stock value decreased each week.

I am not sure that is entirely fair. The media certainly did jump at her quickly and set her ablaze. The experience issue was out there as well. Did she really ever have a chance? Did John McCain pick her to be the patsy when he knew he'd lose and the finger could be pointed at her? No one really knows. My personal feeling is that he would have lost regardless of the running mate he chose. The fact that after the race, everyone looked at her as the problem is really quite unfair. The incumbent President had the lowest approval rating since tracking was created eons ago. The two wars raging and the rationale for going to war in the first place. The terrible economy. It already spelled DOOM. Let's not forget that John McCain looked to be another four years of Bushisms. He did actually vote with Bush 90% of the time. That's not really a maverick, is it? Sarah Palin was never fully evaluated before the election so throwing her to the piranhas doesn't seem fair.

I believe she will come around. She will ultimately be a positive for the Republican party but it's going to take awhile. She might want to consider becoming a Senator first as her next gig. If she gets the Washington experience coupled with that hockey mom/lipstick attitude...She just might become the winner after all.

War Is Hell...

I will probably get flamed for this one but war is absolute hell. It's not pretty. It's not funny. It's gory. It's ugly. It sucks. People die. Civilians die. Militants die. Countries rise and fall. Where is it said that war will be nice and tidy?

Let's begin with our war on terrorism. Honestly, the enemy is well hidden, small, and attacks in ways never comprehended before. As far I am concerned war against the United States is exactly that...WAR...

George S. Patton once said in WWII...'You win a war not by dying for your country but by having the other poor bastard die for his.' Now that is the point. You must win. You do not have a choice to come in second place. It doesn't work that way. If we have to interrogate a prisoner who has vital information...then we do it. We do not pull out a book on human rights. If waterboarding does get information, by all means...I love how people are against torturing prisoners but have never been in a war or asked to fight. They have never seen limbs hanging by a thread.

Now I agree...if we have captured a prisoner, feel they have no immediate value in terms of intelligence information, and are not a immediate threat, then they should be treated with dignity and respect as outlined within the Geneva Convention. But let me state...if we need to win a war, we are not going to be nice. You do not win by being humane or nice. You win a war by defeating your opponent. That generally means killing them.

Maybe I am an old fart with my outdated philosophy but let me tell you this...Even back to the Civil War where General Sherman stated...War is hell. That's all he said. WAR IS HELL. So get off the high horses and ask yourself a question....do you want to win or lose? That is the only question you need ask.

Flint Music Scene - Early 1980's - Wyatt Earp Records

I found this article on Doug 'Wyatt' Earp and his passing back in 2004. I did not write any of this particular article, I only copied it here as a fond memory of the music store Doug started back in Flint when I was in high school. Reading through this article...I would have sworn I could have written it since the writer (Brent Bonet) had the exact same thoughts about Doug as I had. Doug introduced me to the british 'syth' scene in the early 80's and knew exactly what kind of new music I liked. When I stopped by the store, he'd pull out a new lp and say 'you'll love this one' and 90% of the time, I did. Doug was one unique individual and sounds like alot of people will miss him. If you want to know about Doug and his music store in Flint...keep reading. Brent sums it up quite nicely....

Doug ("Wyatt") Earp 1953 - 2004
Posted June 1, 2005 By Brent Bonet

Was back in Flint over the Memorial Day holiday. While there I stopped at Wyatt Earp Records to say “Hi” to Doug. Come to find out that he died of cancer in December at the age of 50. It felt like someone punched me in the stomach. Doug (”Wyatt”) Earp was the musical “enabler” for me and all of my suffering music loving friends. In the early to mid eighties (and beyond) he was our only source for the emerging punk and new wave music that we craved while stuck in the culturally deprived outpost of Flint, Michigan. Every Tuesday he would get a new list of music, domestic and imported, that was being released that week and in upcoming weeks. He was more important to me than Rodney Bigenheimer, John Peel, or Claire Kember. He changed my life. He was a friend. He was an Icon. Doug, I didn’t see you too often over the last 20 years, but your face, your voice, your smile, your laugh will be with me forever. I’ll miss you.

The obituary follows:From alt.obituaries:

Store owner nurtured music scene Doug Earp, 50 -- THE FLINT JOURNAL FIRST EDITION

By Doug Pullendpul…@flintjournal.com · 810.766.6140Doug Earp wasn’t a musician, but he was famous around town forsupporting and nurturing them. The owner and founder of Flint Township’s Wyatt Earp Records died ofcomplications due to cancer early Friday morning, three days shy of his 51st birthday. Earp was famous in local underground music circles - punk, heavy metal, rap - for being the guy who offered encouraging words, sold their albums and provided a place where they could promote their bands and socialize with others who shared their love of music, particularly music outside the mainstream. “His contributions have been immeasurable. He was like a den father.His record store was ground zero, the mother ship, for the wholescene,” said author Ben Hamper, who hosted a long-running punk musicradio and TV show, “Take No Prisoners,” which Earp sponsored. Earp’s death caught a lot of people by surprise. He was married for the first time Nov. 18. He started feeling ill about six weeks ago,according to Al Steel, his friend and co-worker for 18 years. “He just thought he had a cold,” said Steel, who described his fallencolleague and mentor as “my brother, my father, my best friend.” Earp was hospitalized Dec. 5 at Genesys Regional Medical Center inGrand Blanc Township, and was told he didn’t have long to live. Steel said his friend and boss took the grim news in stride. “He was the ultimate realist,” Steel said. “That’s why when the doctors told him what was going on, he told them thank you and gave them the thumbs up sign.” His life was a big thumbs up to the local music community he loved somuch. A Swartz Creek High School graduate, Earp worked at BoogieRecords and Rock-a-Rolla Records before starting his store, named after the 19th century lawman who supposedly was a distant relative, in 1981. The store, at 5204 Corunna Road in Flint Township, and its owner played an integral role in developing a healthy underground rock scene that is alive and well today. “As a teenager from the suburbs, walking into Wyatt Earp Records waslike visiting Willy Wonka’s Chocolate Factory. Everywhere you lookedwas something you’d never seen before and you probably wanted,”recalled Joel Rash, owner of Flint Local 432, a downtown Flintalternative music space. Earp bankrolled Rash’s first all-ages shows in the late 1980s. He also helped out some of Flint’s earliest and important underground bands, including Repulsion, whose extreme brand of heavy metal, called grindcore, has been cited as an influence on European metal bands such as Napalm Death. Earp was one of the area’s first alternative music promoters, bringing pivotal punk and metal acts such as Slayer, Black Flag and 7 Seconds to town. He was famous for his cool, nonjudgmental approach to music. “Doug always seems calmly amused by something, in a Buddhist kind ofway,” local club disc jockey Michael Absher, who first met Earp in1984, wrote in an e-mail. “This is a man who kept an independent record store going for years in an out-of-the-way spot, with no advertising, as chain stores and other independents crashed and burned in a dwindling economy. And he never seemed to even break a sweat doing it.” Steel plans to keep the store open, though it will be closed Monday for Earp’s funeral. “I have every intention of carrying it on,” Steel said. Earp is survived by his wife, Sarah. Visitation will be from 7-9 p.m. today and 2-5 p.m. and 7-9 p.m. Sunday at Sharp Funeral Home, 8138 Miller Road, Swartz Creek. The funeral service will be at 11 a.m. Monday at Sharp. The family requests contributions be made to the Lance Armstrong Foundation.